|
| | Capital Finance
Plans...
Preparing
capital finance plans
is one of the most important capital formation activities and needs to be
carefully considered by the development sponsor/project owner as capital finance
plans only get one bite at the apple. Rainmaker Marketing
Corporation's
approach to developing capital finance plans (and other commercial
real estate loan proposals, syndication
proposals and/or private
placement offerings) focuses on the following key
due diligence issues:
 |
The Market Case
Study. There must be clear and convincing market evidence
supporting the proposed project. Typically, this is
accomplished with an arm's-length market
feasibility study. RMC can provide the market feasibility
study, but you can have any qualified consulting firm prepare
it. RMC hopes you will give our firm all due
consideration. This must be summarized and will be part of
your eventual proposal that emerges from the due diligence analysis. |
 |
The Financial Case
Study. There must be a compelling case made that the financial
results of operations will generate materially significant profits
capable of servicing the required construction/mini-perm/perm loan
and providing a solid return on investment. Typically, a pro
forma financial presentation is prepared for the purposes of
demonstrating these issues. As with the market study, RMC
hopes you will give us consideration in preparing the pro forma
financial presentation. |
 | The Business Case
Study. Every project funding proposal has to offer clear,
concise and factual information that supports management's claim the
totality of business operations (i.e.: Pre-Development Phase,
Pre-Construction Phase, Construction Phase and the Initial Business
Operations Phase) are well within the sponsor's demonstrable skill
sets. Boiled down to the essentials, the "business case
study" must show key managers having direct track records of
experience in similar operations that resulted in a profitable
outcome that investors can appreciate. |
 |
The Regulatory Case
Study. Your capital funding proposal must demonstrate that all
regulatory oversight issues have been identified and programmed on a
basis that transfers the regulatory risk to a third-party in cases
where it is clear the project sponsor/developer cannot (for whatever
reason) manage this part of the development program.
Regulatory risks are one of the areas where institutional investors
will not provide investor funds because these are risks they believe
the developer/sponsor should fund. |
 |
The Entitlement
Case Study. The entitlements review is frequently left to the
side and this is always to the detriment of the developer/sponsor
group. Are there federal incentives and/or subsidies available
for this class of assets? What about the state and local
levels? These questions need to be asked and answered because
some incentives can become a materially significant issue when we
look at the issues of dilution and return on investment. RMC
can help and you should at least have a cursory discussion with a
RMC consultant on this matter. |
 |
The Structured
Finance Case Study. The final part of the overall proposal
development regimen is the structuring of the various pieces to the
"capital stack" into a homogenous group of related
elements that serve to provide equity replacement funds, government
incentives and institutional market participation in your
project. You have to have a funding order that makes sense and
an order of retirement that is acceptable to all parties. |
| |
|

|
Do
You Know The Secret?
When it comes to commercial real
estate development finance, it doesn't matter whether you need to raise
$5 million or $50 million, the out-of-pocket costs, advance fees and
project due diligence costs will always require the same relative
investment dollars the promoters have to fund. Do you know what
that amount is? Do you know the Secret? |
|